Skip to content

Deglobalization? Or just an end to globalization?

↓ Jump to responses

Download the newsletter ›

By Salvatore Babones

From Global Asia Newsletter #007

The GFC marked the end of the globalization era.  A fully globalized but no longer globalizing economic order is now taking shape.

Most people think globalization started in the 1990s.  But if you look at the data, global trade and investment started to rise rapidly right after the 1972 collapse of the Bretton Woods system of managed exchange rates.  Both merchandise trade and foreign investment peaked in 2007-2008.  Growth has continued in currency exchange markets but at a slower pace than in the early 2000s.  It took 25 years for the world’s major markets in raw materials (oil, etc.) and manufactured goods to stabilize at a market equilibrium.  Bracket the “globalization era” with the dates 1973-2008, RIP: Al Jazeera | China: The Most Visible Victim of Deglobalization

Some of the first major beneficiaries of currency and trade liberalization were the Gulf oil exporters.  Opec may be a cartel but it has never been a successful monopolist.  The massive redistribution of the world’s income towards oil (and other commodities) exporters in the 1970s was the result of prices rising to a market equilibrium level.  A second move to market equilibrium was China’s reindustrialization of the 1980s through the 2000s.  The reorientation of the world’s manufacturing base to China was inevitable, though that hasn’t made it any more popular than high oil prices: Al Jazeera | Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and China

The crisis of 2008 can be understood as the end of a period of massive redistribution caused by the breaking of the dams that held back global markets in the post-war period.  The sub-prime mortgage bubble and the Euro fiasco were directly caused by gross economic mismanagement, and good (bad) policies could have made them much smaller (bigger), but the dramatic break in global economic time series is on a different scale entirely.  The global integration of the world’s economy is now complete.  The next few centuries (yes, centuries) will clarify its direction.  Personally I expect that the United States will be its biggest beneficiary.

Subscribe to the Global Asia Newsletter

From: p.13 of World Economics Association Newsletter 6(5), October 2016
http://www.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/Issue6-5.pdf

Download WEA newsletter Volume 6, Issue No. 5, October 2016 ›

1 response

  • Mohinder Kumar says:

    Global Financial Crisis (GFC) just indicated that FINANCE is terrorizing force. Finance shall raise its head again. Finance detests humans but loves wage-labor class. It loves geographical borders. Specters can move anywhere anytime; so can finance capital. It’s a nightmare idea to conceive that finance is a ghost-like thing. We’ll have to devise methods to bury it. If banks go out; MFIs shall get in . . . to create terror. Banks and FIs are bigger alien terrorists than normal terrorists. Great Leap Forward (GLF) of Mao was also a sort of economic “integration” a la national globalization. It killed 60 million. Open the geographical borders, put armies to disaster management, shed your national chauvinism, globalization will be completed within hours.

Respond to this article

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note that your email address will not be published.